Canada · Adequacy · v2026.2 · August 2026

Demand is a TWh problem and a GW problem, and they are not the same year.

CER Energy Future 2026 is the only series that puts every province on one workbook. IESO, AESO, Hydro-Québec, and BC Hydro are the series you actually plan a system with. They will not match. The point of this page is to show the spread, and to keep announced megawatts out of the operating stack.

622 → 975
TWh generation, 2023–2050, CER Current Measures
567 → 814
TWh end-use electricity, same scenario
159 → 308
GW nameplate capacity, same scenario
39 / 26–29
Ontario 2026: installed GW vs summer-effective GW

National: generation fan versus demand fan

End-use electricity is always below generation in the national total because of exports and losses. The interesting number is the slope. Current Measures has generation growing ~57% by 2050 and end-use ~44%. Canada Net-zero has generation more than doubling. Capacity grows faster than energy because wind, solar, and storage have lower capacity factors than the hydro and nuclear they sit beside.

202320352050 4008001200
Generation · Current Measures Generation · Net-zero End-use · Current Measures End-use · Net-zero
Figure A. Canadian generation (solid) vs end-use electricity (dashed), TWh. Source: CER Energy Future 2026. End-use converted from PJ.

Nameplate capacity is not peak capability

CER Current Measures takes national capacity from 159 GW (2023) to 174 GW (2026) to 226 GW (2035) to 308 GW (2050). Net-zero is 402 GW in 2050. Ontario’s IESO is the honest local translation: 39 GW installed at end-2026, 26–29 GW summer-effective. Wind, solar, and hydro on a dry or still day do not equal their sticker.

CER Current Measures 20232026203020352050
Capacity (GW) 159174194226308
Generation (TWh) 622653704800975
End-use electricity (TWh) 567569604661814
Generation − end-use (TWh) 5584100139161

The residual is exports + losses − imports, not a surplus you can sell twice. Source: CER EF2026.

Four systems, same workbook

Québec uses more electricity than it generates in-province — Churchill Falls is an import. B.C. in 2023 did the same because of drought; Site C (operating 2025) changes the 2026 row. Ontario generates more than it uses and still has a mid-2030s capacity problem because peak is not annual energy. Alberta’s energy balances; its peak and ramps do not.

Quebec

70 140 220 290 20232026203020352050
Generation (TWh) End-use electricity (TWh)
20232026203020352050
Generation TWh195.5213.2222.7221.4257.4
End-use TWh209.5205.3211.7223.1254.1
Capacity GW46.948.351.954.368.4
Gen − end-use-14.07.911.1-1.73.2
CER Current Measures. Negative residual is Churchill Falls in-flow, not a deficit of electrons in Montréal.

Ontario

60 130 190 250 20232026203020352050
Generation (TWh) End-use electricity (TWh)
20232026203020352050
Generation TWh158.1151.7155.3173.2225.5
End-use TWh138.5137.6149.3167.3218.1
Capacity GW43.445.046.948.473.2
Gen − end-use19.714.16.06.07.5
CER Current Measures. Compare IESO 2026 APO: 152 TWh net demand in 2026, 250 TWh in 2050 — a different definition and a higher 2050 than CER’s 218 TWh end-use.

Alberta

40 80 130 170 20232026203020352050
Generation (TWh) End-use electricity (TWh)
20232026203020352050
Generation TWh84.190.5100.0102.5149.2
End-use TWh76.379.086.595.8128.3
Capacity GW21.029.231.135.560.5
Gen − end-use7.811.613.56.720.9
CER Current Measures. AESO plans in MW of AIL, not these TWh. 2025 observed peak 12,785 MW.

British Columbia

30 60 100 130 20232026203020352050
Generation (TWh) End-use electricity (TWh)
20232026203020352050
Generation TWh56.268.880.8103.5114.0
End-use TWh61.465.672.485.5107.8
Capacity GW19.020.224.035.041.0
Gen − end-use-5.23.28.418.06.2
CER Current Measures. 2023 is a drought year. Site C (~5.1 TWh) is in from August 2025.

What the operators say (mid-2026)

Use these for the dossier. Use CER only to compare provinces.

Ontario · IESO

2026 Annual Planning Outlook · 2026-03-20

Ontario is adequate into the early 2030s after storage and gas procurements. The next capacity hole is mid-2030s as gas contracts expire and demand keeps rising. Installed capacity ~39 GW at end-2026 (nuclear 8.5, gas/oil 11.4, hydro 9.3, wind 5.5, solar 2.6, storage 1.2). Summer effective capacity is 26–29 GW in the late 2020s — nameplate is not peak capability. Dual-peaking arrives in the late 2030s in the reference case. Data centres are 8.6% of 2050 demand. Efficiency knocks 8% off 2050 demand, about Toronto’s current annual use.

Net annual energy demand (includes embedded). Not the same as CER end-use electricity. Installed capacity is IESO-visible resources; effective capacity is lower.

Alberta · AESO

2024 Long-term Outlook (latest published; 2026 LTO in preparation) · 2024-05-15

Energy-only market plus a 2024–25 renewable and storage build. Coal finished June 2024. The 2024 LTO Reference Case adds ~26 GW of capacity and retrofits to 2043 (solar, wind, CCGT+CCUS, and 1.8 GW of SMRs only in the last two years of that outlook — announced, not a plant). Near-term adequacy is a winter-peak and flexibility problem, not an annual-energy problem. The 2026 LTO is in stakeholder process and is not published as of August 2026.

Alberta Internal Load (AIL), hourly average and peak. 2025 observed AIL: average 10,316 MW, peak 12,785 MW.

Quebec · Hydro-Québec

Action Plan 2035 + DCIA (17 Aug 2026) · 2026-08-17

Québec is no longer in structural surplus every year. 2023 drought cut exports. Action Plan 2035 is a build-and-efficiency programme because domestic load (heat, industry, data centres) is catching heritage hydro. The 17 August 2026 Definitive Cooperation and Implementation Agreement replaces the 1969 Churchill Falls contract: 6,915 MW firm to 2077 at 6¢/kWh, Gull Island (2,700 MW, ~12 TWh, target 2036–37), Churchill Falls upgrades (about 1,275 MW on existing units, expansion up to 2,500 MW), and 2,000 MW of Labrador wind under study. New Labrador MW are announced/agreed, not operating. Combined construction value cited at nearly $70B, with up to $10B federal support.

HQ plans in MW and TWh of additional supply, not a published annual demand table comparable to IESO. Québec end-use already exceeds in-province generation because of Churchill Falls in-flows.

British Columbia · BC Hydro

Site C in-service + February 2026 Reference Load Forecast · 2026-02

Site C closed the near-term energy gap that the 2023 drought made visible. The next problem is delivering power to the north coast (North Coast Transmission Line) and serving LNG Canada, possible Phase 2, Cedar, Woodfibre, and mines. Heritage hydro plus Site C is still a winter-peaking reservoir system. 2023 imports were weather, not a new identity — but the load forecast no longer assumes a fat surplus.

Site C: 1,100 MW / ~5.1 TWh/year, all six units in service 9 August 2025. Load forecast is BC Hydro’s February 2026 reference (oil and gas / LNG is a rising slice).

What changed since the last atlas cut

WhenWhatStatus now
2024-06 Alberta coal-fired generation fully phased out (coal-to-gas conversions). operating
2024-12 Pickering A retired. Pickering B refurbishment is the remaining Pickering question. retired
2025-06-30 LNG Canada first cargo from Kitimat. Train 2 producing November 2025. 50 cargoes by February 2026. operating
2025-08-09 Site C, all six units in service. 1,100 MW / ~5.1 TWh. operating
2026-02 Darlington Unit 4 returned from refurbishment ahead of schedule. Federal EV Availability Standard repealed (will land in IESO 2027 APO). operating
2026-03-20 IESO 2026 APO: +65% energy by 2050 (reference); capacity hole delayed to mid-2030s. announced
2026-03/04 Darlington SMR: CNSC cleared reactor-building foundation hold point; first BWRX-300 is under construction, not a paper plant. under construction
2026-05/06 Champlain Hudson Power Express / Hertel–New York, 1,250 MW, in commercial operation. Hydro-Québec contract with New York began 1 June 2026. operating
2026-08-17 Hydro-Québec / NL Hydro Definitive Cooperation and Implementation Agreement replaces the 1969 Churchill Falls contract. 6,915 MW firm to 2077. Gull Island and CF expansion remain to be built. announced